Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

Audit of Trade Receivables – Completeness & Cut-off Procedures

## Audit of Trade Receivables – Completeness & Cut-off Procedures

### The Core Risk

Completeness means: all genuine receivables that should be recorded, ARE recorded. The opposite risk is omission — sales made before year-end are left out of receivables.

Cut-off is the mechanism that ensures transactions are recorded in the correct accounting period. A cut-off error occurs when a sale made before year-end is recorded in the next year, or vice versa.

---

### The Cut-Off Decision Rule for Debtors

SituationTreatment
Invoice issued in last 5 days of the year AND goods dispatched before year-endInclude in Debtors
All goods dispatched prior to period-endInclude in Debtors
Goods dispatched after year-end (even if invoice raised)Do NOT include in Debtors

> The trigger for recording a debtor is dispatch of goods (risk & reward transfer), not just raising an invoice.

---

### Step-by-Step Cut-Off Procedures

#### Procedure (i) – Last-5-Days Invoice Test

  • Identify all invoices issued in the last 5 days before the period-end.
  • For each such invoice, check the corresponding dispatch date.
  • If goods were dispatched before year-end → receivable is valid → include in debtors.
  • If goods were dispatched after year-end → do not include.

#### Procedure (ii) – Test Invoices Listed on the Receivables Report

  • Vouch a sample of invoices appearing on the Accounts Receivable report.
  • Verify each has a corresponding dispatch/delivery evidence.

#### Procedure (iii) – Match Invoices to Shipping Log

  • Compare the Invoice Date against the Shipping/Dispatch Date from the shipping log.
  • Invoice date before dispatch date = potential early revenue recognition (Completeness/Cut-off error).

#### Procedure (iv) – Bill-and-Hold Sales

  • Examine any sales where goods are billed to the customer but not yet dispatched (held by the seller).
  • Scrutinise supporting documentation to check genuineness of the transaction.
  • Bill-and-hold sales are a well-known technique for inflating year-end sales and debtors.

#### Procedure (v) – Review Discounts

  • Verify that discounts allowed are as per company policy and properly authorised.

#### The 3-Day Dispatch Review (Last Days of Year)

  • Obtain detailed shipping/dispatch logs for the last 3 days of the accounting year.
  • Verify that any dispatches in these last days have corresponding invoices recorded in the current year, not the next.
  • Sales booking for goods dispatched in the last days of the year must be in the current year only.

Worked example

### Example 1

Example – Cut-off Test:

Goods worth ₹3,00,000 were dispatched on 29th March. The invoice was raised on 2nd April (next year). Question: Should the debtor be included in the 31st March balance sheet?

Answer: YES — because the goods were dispatched (risk & reward transferred) BEFORE year-end. The invoice date is irrelevant. The auditor should identify this through the shipping log vs. invoice date comparison and ensure the receivable is recorded at 31st March.

Conversely: Goods dispatched on 3rd April with invoice dated 30th March → debtor should NOT be in the 31st March balance sheet.

### Example 2

Example – Bill-and-Hold Test:

Audit team finds an invoice for ₹10,00,000 dated 28th March to Customer X, but the shipping log shows no dispatch. When queried, management says 'the customer asked us to hold the goods.' Procedure: Obtain written agreement from Customer X confirming the bill-and-hold arrangement, check if Customer X has accepted risk of ownership, verify the goods are separately identified as Customer X's goods. If these conditions are not met, the sale should not be recognised.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Using the invoice date as the cut-off date instead of the dispatch/shipping date — revenue is recognised on transfer of risk & reward, not on invoice generation.
  • Ignoring bill-and-hold arrangements — these are a classic area for revenue manipulation at year-end.
  • Testing only the last day's invoices instead of the last 3–5 days — errors are spread across multiple days near year-end.
  • Failing to inspect the shipping log — without cross-referencing invoice dates to actual dispatch dates, cut-off errors remain undetected.
  • Not checking whether last-day dispatches are recorded in the current year's revenue books.
Reference:
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic