## Reliability of Audit Evidence — SA 500
### The Core Principle
The reliability of audit evidence depends on its source, nature, and the circumstances under which it is obtained (including controls over its preparation and maintenance).
While exceptions may exist, SA 500 permits certain generalisations that guide the auditor in evaluating reliability.
---
### The Five Generalisations (Memory Aid: IDEO)
| # | Generalisation | Higher Reliability → Lower Reliability |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Source: External vs Internal | Evidence from independent external sources is more reliable than internally generated evidence |
| 2 | Internal Controls | Internally generated evidence is more reliable when entity controls over its preparation are effective |
| 3 | Directness | Evidence obtained directly by the auditor is more reliable than evidence obtained indirectly or by inference |
| 4 | Form: Documentary vs Oral | Documentary evidence (paper/electronic) is more reliable than oral evidence |
| 5 | Original vs Copy | Original documents are more reliable than photocopies, facsimiles, scanned, filmed, or digitised copies |
---
### Why Copies Are Less Reliable
Reliability of digitised/photocopied documents depends on the controls over their preparation and maintenance — the auditor cannot be certain the copy is unaltered without those controls.
---
### Practical Application
These generalisations inform auditors in designing audit procedures:
- Bank confirmation (external, direct) > Bank reconciliation prepared by client (internal, indirect)
- Original invoice > Scanned invoice in ERP
- Physical inspection by auditor > Management's certificate
- Written representation > Oral confirmation