Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

Treatment of Material Losses — Waste, Scrap, Spoilage, Defectives, Obsolescence

## Treatment of Material Losses

Material losses fall into five categories. Each has a different nature and accounting treatment.

### Quick Comparison Table

TypeDefinitionRecoverable?Rectifiable?
WasteRaw material lost/discarded in storage or productionGenerally noNo
ScrapResidue with small/no value; cannot be used as-isSmall valueNo (usually)
SpoilageBadly damaged in process; cannot be rectified economicallySmall value via disposalNo
DefectivesSub-standard output; can be rectifiedSold at lower priceYes
ObsolescenceLoss in value due to technological changeDisposal valueN/A

### (i) Waste

  • Lost during storage or production; may be visible (clippings) or invisible (evaporation).
  • Normal: Absorbed into cost of good production.
  • Abnormal: Transferred to Costing Profit & Loss Account.

### (ii) Scrap

  • Residual material with small but recoverable value; sometimes reintroduced as raw material.
  • Normal: Cost borne by good units; realisable value deducted from total cost.
  • Abnormal: Scrap Account charged with full cost; profit/loss on realisation → Costing P&L.

### (iii) Spoilage

  • Materials badly damaged; cannot be economically rectified; removed from process.
  • Normal (inherent in process): Cost included in production order or spread via production overhead. Realisable value credited to production order/overhead.
  • Abnormal (non-inherent causes): Full cost charged to Costing P&L.
  • Special case: Spoilage due to rigid specifications → cost absorbed by good production; disposal cost charged to production overhead.

### (iv) Defectives

  • Units that don't meet quality standards but can be rectified (rework) or discarded (rejects).
  • Caused by: sub-standard materials, bad supervision, poor workmanship, inadequate equipment.
  • Reworks: Units rectified by additional material, labour, and overhead.
  • Rejects: Disposed of or recycled.
  • Normal: (Cost of defective − Realisable value) absorbed into material cost of good production.
  • Abnormal: Material cost of abnormal defectives → Costing P&L (after crediting realisable value).

Reclamation Steps for Defective Units:

1. Send all defective units to a designated area.

2. Dismantle units.

3. Separate good/serviceable parts → return to stock.

4. Repairable parts → workshop → return to stock after repair.

5. Irreparable parts → collect for scrap sale or melting.

### (v) Obsolescence

  • Loss in intrinsic value due to supersession by technology or market change.
  • Circumstances: spare part/component machine is discontinued; product itself is obsolete; material replaced by superior alternative.
  • Treatment: Immediate disposal at best available price.
  • The loss is abnormal → does not form part of cost of manufacture → charged to Costing P&L.

Worked example

### Example 1

Normal vs Abnormal Scrap Treatment

Production run: 1,000 units; normal scrap rate = 5%.

Actual scrap = 70 units; Total cost = ₹10,000.

Normal scrap = 50 units (5% of 1,000). Scrap realisable value = ₹2/unit.

Normal scrap treatment:

  • Revenue from 50 units scrap = 50 × ₹2 = ₹100 credited to production cost.
  • Net cost to absorb into 950 good units.

Abnormal scrap = 70 − 50 = 20 units.

  • Cost attributed to abnormal scrap = 20/1,000 × ₹10,000 = ₹200.
  • Realisable value = 20 × ₹2 = ₹40; credited to Scrap Account.
  • Net ₹160 transferred to Costing Profit & Loss Account.

### Example 2

Defectives — Normal Treatment

500 units produced; 20 units are normal defective (reworkable).

Cost of rework per unit = ₹15; realisable value of unrectable rejects = ₹8/unit (say 5 units).

Cost of 20 defectives (proportion of production cost) = ₹400.

Less: Realisable value of 5 rejects = ₹40.

Net charge to good production = ₹360 spread over 495 good units.

Rework cost of 15 units = 15 × ₹15 = ₹225 added to production cost.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Treating all scrap as the same as waste — scrap has recoverable value and is identifiable; waste typically does not.
  • Confusing spoilage with defectives — spoilage cannot be rectified economically; defectives can be reworked or recycled.
  • Charging abnormal losses to production overhead instead of Costing P&L — only normal losses are part of product cost.
  • Forgetting to credit realisable/disposal value before transferring the net abnormal loss to Costing P&L.
  • Treating obsolescence as a normal cost — it is an abnormal loss and must be excluded from cost of production.
  • Mixing up 'rejects' (defectives that cannot be rectified) with 'reworks' (defectives that can be fixed) — the accounting treatment differs.
Reference:
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic