Worked Solution
✓ VerifiedAnswer: (A)
The fraud of ₹2,80,000 was committed in January 2026, i.e., during the financial year ended 31st March, 2026. It was detected in April 2026, which is after the balance sheet date but before the approval of financial statements (31st May, 2026).
As per AS 4 (Contingencies and Events Occurring After the Balance Sheet Date), events occurring after the balance sheet date that provide evidence of conditions that existed at the balance sheet date are classified as adjusting events. Since the fraud itself occurred in January 2026 (within the reporting period), the underlying condition existed before year-end. Accordingly, the full loss of ₹2,80,000 must be recognized in the Profit and Loss account for the year ended 31st March, 2026.
Write it like this
1The skeleton
- Lock the date sequence first — write 'fraud committed January 2026 → detected April 2026 → statements approved May 2026' in one line, because the examiner needs to see you tracked all three dates before you apply any standard.
- Name AS 4 and the exact classification — say 'adjusting event under AS 4' not just 'event after balance sheet date'; the label itself carries marks in MCQ justification.
- State the condition-existed logic — your one-liner must say the underlying condition (the fraud itself) existed before 31st March 2026, which is the trigger for adjusting treatment.
- Give the accounting outcome explicitly — 'recognize ₹2,80,000 as loss in P&L for the year ended 31st March, 2026' with the rupee figure; don't leave it at 'should be adjusted'.
2Examiner-rewarded phrases
3Common trap
Most students call this a non-adjusting event because detection happened in April — but detection date is irrelevant; what matters is *when the fraud occurred*. If you pick the wrong option because you confused 'detection after year-end' with 'non-adjusting', you've fallen for the classic AS 4 trap.