Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

Rule of Exceptional Construction

# Rule of Exceptional Construction

This rule covers situations where a statute requires a special or exceptional reading of certain words or provisions. It has five sub-rules:

## (i) Common Sense Rule

  • General principle: Full effect must be given to every word in a statute.
  • Exception: Words may be eliminated if no sensible meaning can be drawn from them.

## (ii) Construction of 'and' and 'or'

WordNatureEffect
'and'ConjunctiveRequirements of BOTH provisions must be satisfied
'or'DisjunctiveSatisfying requirements of ANY ONE clause is sufficient

## (iii) Construction of the word 'may'

  • Default: Generally has directory force only (discretionary).
  • Exception - Mandatory force: 'May' is read as mandatory when:

(a) The subject involves a discretion coupled with an obligation (power + duty to discharge it).

(b) Where a remedy will be advanced and mischief suppressed.

## (iv) Construction of the word 'shall' or 'must'

  • Default: Has mandatory force.
  • Where the statute provides a specific penalty for non-compliance, the Court has NO discretion — the provision must be treated as mandatory.
  • Exception - Directory force: 'Shall' is treated as directory when:

(a) Used against the Government (unless contrary intention is manifest);

(b) The legislature's intention so demands;

(c) A mandatory reading would produce absurd results.

## (v) Judging a provision as Mandatory or Directory

Depends on the purpose of the Act, legislative intention, and public inconvenience. Generalizations:

IndicatorMandatory / Directory
Prohibitory provisions (negative words)Mandatory
Non-compliance attracts penaltyMandatory
Power coupled with dutyMandatory
Enacted to prevent fraud/mischiefMandatory
No public policy involved (mere procedure)Directory

Worked example

### Example 1

'May' construed as mandatory — Section 5 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 says 'a marriage may be solemnized between two Hindus'. Despite the word 'may', the Court held this to be mandatory: both parties MUST be Hindus. A marriage between a Christian male and a Hindu female solemnized under the Act was held void. The preamble (an Act to codify law relating to marriage among Hindus) supported this construction.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Reading 'may' as always discretionary — it can be mandatory where power is coupled with duty, or where mischief must be suppressed.
  • Reading 'shall' as always mandatory — it can be directory when used against Government, or when a mandatory reading produces absurdity.
  • Treating every procedural provision as mandatory — if no public policy is involved, procedure is generally directory.
  • Confusing the conjunctive 'and' with the disjunctive 'or' — 'and' requires both, 'or' requires either.
Reference:
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic