## Baumol vs Miller-Orr — A Comparison
### Baumol's Model (EOQ for Cash)
#### Concept
The optimum cash level is that level where carrying costs and transaction costs are minimised.
#### Two Costs Trade Off
- Carrying cost: Interest forgone on marketable securities held as cash.
- Transaction cost: Cost of converting marketable securities to cash (clerical, brokerage, registration).
#### Optimum Cash Balance Formula
$$ C = \sqrt{\frac{2 \times U \times P}{S}} $$
Where:
- C = Optimum cash balance
- U = Annual (or monthly) cash disbursements
- P = Fixed cost per transaction
- S = Opportunity cost of one rupee p.a. (or p.m.)
#### Assumption
Cash usage is steady and predictable (like inventory EOQ).
### Miller-Orr Model
#### Concept
A stochastic (random) cash flow model. Uses control limits (h, z, 0) — see separate Miller-Orr lesson.
#### Behaviour
- When cash hits h → invest (h − z) in securities.
- When cash hits 0 → liquidate z worth of securities.
- Between limits → no action.
### Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Baumol | Miller-Orr |
|---|---|---|
| Cash flow nature | Steady, certain | Random, stochastic |
| Decision variable | Single quantity C* | Limits h and z |
| When to transact | Every time C is consumed | When h or 0 is hit |
| Mathematical base | EOQ formula | Control theory |
| Best suited for | Firms with predictable outflows | Firms with volatile cash flows |
| Trigger | Time-based (cash runs to zero) | Threshold-based |