# Financing Current Assets — Risk vs Return
Financing current assets is fundamentally a trade-off between risk and return.
- Short-term finance → cheaper, but higher risk (refinancing risk, interest-rate risk, possible shortage of funds).
- Long-term finance → more expensive, but safer (locked-in funding).
The mix chosen defines the firm's financing strategy.
## The Three Approaches
### 1. Matching (Hedging) Approach
- Long-term finance funds: fixed assets + permanent current assets.
- Short-term finance funds: temporary / fluctuating current assets.
- The maturity of the source matches the life of the asset it finances → moderate risk, moderate cost.
### 2. Conservative Approach
- Long-term finance funds: fixed assets + permanent current assets + a part of temporary current assets.
- Short-term finance plays only a small role.
- Lower risk of cash shortage; higher cost because more expensive long-term funds are used.
### 3. Aggressive Approach
- Short-term finance funds: all temporary current assets + a part of permanent current assets.
- Cheaper than the other two approaches but most risky — heavy reliance on rollover of short-term debt.
## Decision Factors
The firm should weigh:
- Tolerance for liquidity risk
- Cost differential between short- and long-term debt
- Stability and predictability of cash flows
- Access to short-term credit markets in tight times
## Quick Summary
| Approach | Risk | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Conservative | Low | High |
| Matching | Medium | Medium |
| Aggressive | High | Low |