Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

Audit of Purchases — Occurrence Testing

# Audit of Purchases

Purchases drive cost of goods sold and inventory valuation. Misstatement direction:

  • Understatement of purchases → understated COGS → overstated profit.
  • Overstatement of purchases → fictitious vendors, fund diversion.

## Audit Procedure — Occurrence

Ensure purchases are not understated or overstated by checking:

### 1. Fictitious Vendors

  • Whether any fictitious vendors have been booked.
  • Test vendor master for duplicate addresses, common bank accounts, employee-linked vendors.

### 2. Physical Receipt of Goods

  • Whether goods were received at the factory gate.
  • Verify entry in the security gate inward register — this is the first independent record of goods entry.

### 3. Quality Inspection

  • Whether quality inspection of goods was done — quality reports document conformance to purchase orders.

### 4. Goods Receipt Note (GRN)

  • Whether the GRN was prepared and signed by appropriate client personnel.
  • The GRN is the link between physical receipt and the accounting record.

### 5. Approval of Purchase Invoice

  • Whether the purchase invoice was approved by an authorised signatory before booking.

## The Three-Way Match

Though not explicitly named in this section, the procedure described is essentially the three-way match:

  • Purchase Order (PO) — what was authorised
  • GRN / Gate Inward Register — what was received
  • Vendor Invoice — what is being paid

All three must agree in quantity, rate, and specification before the liability is booked.

## Cut-off for Purchases

A critical assertion (not detailed in this excerpt but implied): goods received before year-end must be in inventory and purchases booked, even if the invoice arrives later. Conversely, goods received after year-end must NOT be in current-year purchases.

Worked example

### Example 1

Example — Fictitious vendor: Vendor 'ABC Suppliers' has the same address and bank account as the company's storekeeper. Purchases of Rs 12 lakh were booked from this vendor with no GRNs. The auditor uncovers the fraud by tracing vendor master fields and gate register entries — no goods ever entered.

### Example 2

Example — Three-way match break: PO is for 1,000 units at Rs 100. GRN shows 950 units received. Invoice is for 1,000 units at Rs 100. Without inspecting the GRN, the company may pay for goods not received. The auditor flags this control weakness.

### Example 3

Example — Gate register vs GRN: The auditor compares the gate inward register with GRNs for the last week of the year. Two truckloads with security entries dated 30 March have GRNs dated 2 April. The auditor proposes recording these as purchases of the current year (cut-off correction).

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Booking purchase invoices without verifying GRN and gate entry — leading to payment for goods never received.
  • Not testing vendor master for duplicate or employee-linked vendors.
  • Skipping the gate inward register, the most independent evidence of physical receipt.
  • Allowing purchase booking on invoice date rather than goods receipt date — distorting period of recognition.
  • Failing to perform cut-off testing on purchases at year-end.
Reference:
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic