Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

SA 450 - Evaluation of Misstatements Identified During Audit

# SA 450 — Evaluation of Misstatements Identified During the Audit

## Why this SA exists

As the audit proceeds, the auditor finds errors, omissions and questionable items. SA 450 sets out how to track, communicate, evaluate and document these misstatements so that a defensible opinion can be formed at the end.

## 1. Accumulation of Misstatements

  • The auditor shall accumulate misstatements identified during the audit, other than those that are clearly trivial.
  • Clearly trivial = items that even in aggregate are clearly inconsequential. If there is any uncertainty about whether an item is clearly trivial, it is treated as NOT clearly trivial (i.e., it must be accumulated).

### When the audit strategy/plan must be revised

The auditor reconsiders the overall strategy and plan if:

1. The nature of identified misstatements and the circumstances of their occurrence indicate that other misstatements may exist that could be material; OR

2. The aggregate of misstatements accumulated during the audit approaches materiality.

## 2. Communication and Correction of Misstatements

  • The auditor shall communicate on a timely basis all accumulated misstatements to the appropriate level of management (unless prohibited by law).
  • The auditor shall request management to correct those misstatements.
  • If management corrects them, the auditor checks whether any misstatements still remain.
  • If management refuses to correct some/all misstatements:
  • Obtain an understanding of management's reasons for refusal; and
  • Take that understanding into account when evaluating whether the FS as a whole are free from material misstatement.

## 3. Evaluating the Effect of Uncorrected Misstatements

Before final evaluation:

  • Reassess materiality (originally determined under SA 320) to confirm it remains appropriate in light of actual financial results.
  • Determine whether uncorrected misstatements are material, individually or in aggregate. Consider:
  • Size and nature of the misstatements; and
  • Effect of uncorrected misstatements related to prior periods (e.g., rollover/iron-curtain effects).

## 4. Communication with TCWG

The auditor communicates with Those Charged With Governance about:

  • Uncorrected misstatements and their effect on the auditor's opinion; and
  • The effect of uncorrected misstatements related to prior periods.

## 5. Written Representation (WR)

The auditor shall request a WR from management AND TCWG stating they believe the effects of uncorrected misstatements are immaterial. A summary of such items must be included in the WR.

## 6. Documentation

Audit documentation shall include:

1. The amount below which misstatements would be regarded as clearly trivial (the trivial threshold).

2. All misstatements accumulated during the audit and whether they have been corrected.

3. The auditor's conclusion as to whether uncorrected misstatements are material (individually or in aggregate), and the basis for that conclusion.

## Memory Hook (4 buckets)

A-C-E-C-DAccumulate → Communicate/Correct → Evaluate uncorrected → Communicate with TCWG + WR → Document.

Worked example

### Example 1

Example 1 — Clearly Trivial Threshold

For an audit of XYZ Ltd., overall materiality is fixed at ₹50 lakh and performance materiality at ₹35 lakh. The auditor sets the clearly trivial threshold at ₹2.5 lakh. During the audit, four expense misclassifications of ₹3 lakh each are identified.

Treatment: Each item exceeds the trivial threshold, so all four MUST be accumulated. Although individually below performance materiality, their aggregate (₹12 lakh) plus other items will be evaluated against overall materiality at the end.

### Example 2

Example 2 — Management Refuses Correction

The auditor identifies an unrecorded provision of ₹40 lakh. Management refuses to record it, claiming the dispute is 'remote'.

Auditor's action: (a) Obtain mgt's reasoning (legal opinion, past experience); (b) consider whether refusal indicates bias affecting other estimates; (c) include the ₹40 lakh in uncorrected misstatements; (d) communicate to TCWG; (e) obtain WR; (f) if material, modify the opinion under SA 705.

### Example 3

Example 3 — Approaching Materiality

Materiality is ₹1 crore. Accumulated misstatements during the audit reach ₹85 lakh (85% of materiality) with substantial audit work still remaining.

Auditor's action: The aggregate is approaching materiality — the auditor must revise the overall strategy and audit plan, e.g., lower performance materiality, extend sample sizes, or perform additional procedures in higher-risk areas.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Treating 'clearly trivial' as the same as 'immaterial'. They are different — clearly trivial is a much lower threshold below which items need not even be accumulated.
  • Forgetting to reassess materiality before evaluating uncorrected misstatements — the original figure may no longer fit the actual results.
  • Ignoring uncorrected misstatements of prior periods when evaluating the current year's uncorrected misstatements.
  • Communicating only with management and not with TCWG about uncorrected misstatements.
  • Failing to include the summary of uncorrected misstatements in the Written Representation.
  • Documenting only the misstatements but omitting the basis for concluding they are immaterial.
Bare-Act text SA 450 · SA 450, ICAI Standards on Auditing · click to expand
SA 450 — Evaluation of Misstatements Identified during the Audit. Issued by ICAI; effective for audits of FS for periods beginning on or after 1 April 2010.
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic