## Joint Audit of Financial Statements (SA-299)
### Definition
Joint Audit: Audit of an entity's financial statements by two or more auditors, issuing one audit report.
The auditors involved are called Joint Auditors.
---
### Division of Work
Work is divided based on:
- Time period
- Geographical area
- Component of Financial Statements (e.g., Firm A audits fixed assets; Firm B audits inventory)
---
### Joint Planning Requirements
Before commencing the audit, joint auditors must:
1. Have EP and key ET members from each firm involved in planning
2. Jointly establish an overall audit strategy (scope, timing, direction)
3. Each assess RMM and communicate to other joint auditors
4. Discuss and document NTE for both common areas and specific allotted areas
5. Obtain a common engagement letter and common management representation letter
6. Sign and communicate the work allocation document to TCWG
Joint Audit Plan Development — must:
- Identify division and common audit areas
- Ascertain reporting objectives
- Consider and communicate factors significant to directing effort
- Consider results of preliminary engagement activities
- Ascertain NTE of resources needed
---
### Joint & Several Liability — When Are Joint Auditors Jointly Responsible?
| # | Situation |
|---|---|
| 1 | Work NOT divided among joint auditors — carried out by all |
| 2 | Planning decisions on NTE of procedures for common audit areas |
| 3 | Matters brought to notice by any one auditor AND agreed upon by all |
| 4 | Examining FS compliance with relevant statutes |
| 5 | Presentation and disclosure of FS as per FRF |
| 6 | Ensuring audit report complies with statutes, SAs, and ICAI pronouncements |
Each joint auditor is individually responsible for their specifically allocated areas.
---
### Audit Report
1. Joint auditors hold a common discussion before finalizing
2. Generally, a common opinion is formed
3. If contradiction: Each may provide a different opinion — must reference the other's opinion in an EOM paragraph
4. The opinion is NOT determined by majority — each auditor's judgment is independent
---
### Miscellaneous
- Joint auditors are NOT bound to review each other's work
- Must intimate each other of deficiencies or relevant matters before finalisation
---
### Advantages vs. Disadvantages
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Sharing of expertise | Lack of co-ordination |
| Less workload per auditor | Ignorance of common areas |
| Better audit quality | Superiority complex |
| High level of assurance | Psychological barriers (size differences between firms) |
| Lower staff development costs | Disputes over fee sharing |
| Convenient for MNCs (local law expertise) | Uncertainty about liability |
| Improved service to client | — |
| Healthy competition | — |