Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

SA 700 – Forming an Opinion & Reporting on Financial Statements

## SA 700 – Forming an Opinion & Reporting on Financial Statements

### 1. Objectives (Dual Purpose)

ObjectiveDescription
Form an opinionBased on evaluation of conclusions drawn from audit evidence obtained
Express the opinionThrough a written report that also describes the basis for the opinion

---

### 2. Qualitative Aspects – Evaluating the FS

The auditor evaluates whether the FS are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the Applicable Financial Reporting Framework (AFRF).

This includes considering indicators of possible management bias, such as:

  • Selective correction: correcting misstatements that increase reported earnings but not those that decrease reported earnings
  • Bias in accounting estimates: management's judgments that consistently favour a particular outcome

> Key test: If the cumulative effect of lack of neutrality plus uncorrected misstatements causes the FS as a whole to be materially misstated → auditor must consider a modified opinion.

---

### 3. Specific Evaluations by the Auditor

The auditor must specifically evaluate all six of the following:

1. Disclosure of significant accounting policies selected and applied

2. Appropriateness of accounting policies — consistent with AFRF

3. Reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management

4. Information is relevant, reliable, comparable, and understandable

5. Adequate disclosures enabling users to understand effect of material transactions and events

6. Terminology (including titles of each FS) is appropriate

---

### 4. Basic Elements of the Audit Report

#### Mandatory Sections in Order:

Title — Must clearly indicate it is an independent auditor's report

Addressee — As required by the circumstances of the engagement

Auditor's Opinion — Must include (mnemonic EAT-ND):

  • EEntity whose FS have been audited
  • A → Statement that FS have been Audited
  • TTitles of each statement comprising the FS
  • N → Reference to Notes including summary of significant accounting policies
  • DDate or period covered by each FS

Basis for Opinion — Directly follows the Opinion section; must state (mnemonic S1-A-I-S2):

  • S1 → Audit conducted in accordance with Standards on Auditing
  • A → Reference to Auditor's Responsibilities section of the report
  • I → Statement of auditor Independence and fulfilment of other ethical responsibilities
  • S2 → Whether audit evidence obtained is Sufficient and appropriate to provide basis for opinion

Going Concern — Where applicable, per SA 570 (Revised)

Key Audit Matters (KAM) — Mandatory for listed entities only, per SA 701

Management Responsibilities — Must describe management's responsibility for:

  • Preparing FS per AFRF
  • Maintaining internal control as necessary
  • Assessing entity's ability to continue as a going concern

> Where oversight responsibility differs from management, heading must also refer to Those Charged with Governance.

Auditor's Responsibilities — Must state:

  • Objective: obtain reasonable assurance that FS are free from material misstatement (fraud or error)
  • Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but not a guarantee
  • Misstatements are material if they could influence economic decisions of users

#### Location of Auditor's Responsibilities Description (three permitted options):

1. Within the body of the auditor's report

2. Within an appendix to the report (with cross-reference in the report body)

3. By specific reference to a website of an appropriate authority — only where expressly permitted by law/regulation

#### Additional Requirements for Listed Entities:

  • State that auditor communicates with TCWG on planned scope, timing, and significant audit findings (including internal control deficiencies)
  • Provide TCWG a statement of auditor's independence and communicate all relationships that may bear on independence
  • State that from matters communicated to TCWG, the auditor determines and describes KAM in the report

Worked example

### Example 1

Scenario – Management Bias in Selective Correction: During audit, the auditor finds that ABC Ltd. corrected four misstatements that increased reported profit (totalling ₹5 lakhs) but left uncorrected three misstatements that would have reduced profit (totalling ₹4.5 lakhs). The auditor identifies this as a pattern of management bias. Even though individual uncorrected items may appear immaterial, the cumulative effect of the lack of neutrality must be evaluated. If material, the auditor should consider a qualified or adverse opinion on the grounds that the FS do not present a neutral picture.

### Example 2

Scenario – Basis for Opinion Paragraph (Listed Entity): 'We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Companies Act, 2013. Our responsibilities under those Standards are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilities section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the Code of Ethics issued by the ICAI, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with the Code. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.' This paragraph satisfies the S1–A–I–S2 requirements.

### Example 3

Scenario – KAM for a Listed Entity: The auditor of PQR Ltd. (a listed company) identifies that valuation of goodwill (carrying value ₹120 crore) requires significant management judgment and is susceptible to estimation uncertainty. This is selected as a KAM under SA 701. In the audit report, the auditor must describe: (a) why goodwill impairment was most significant (subjectivity of assumptions); (b) how the auditor addressed it (involving a valuation expert, testing discount rates and growth assumptions); and (c) reference to the relevant disclosure note in the FS.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Confusing 'reasonable assurance' with 'absolute assurance' — the report must explicitly state it is a high level but not a guarantee of detecting all misstatements
  • Omitting the KAM section for listed entities — it is mandatory under SA 701 for all listed entities, not optional
  • Placing additional sections (going concern, KAM) before the Basis for Opinion section — the order matters: Opinion → Basis for Opinion → Going Concern → KAM
  • Failing to include the auditor's independence statement inside the Basis for Opinion section — it is a required element of that specific section
  • Treating the six specific evaluations under Q3 as a checklist to tick rather than substantive professional judgments about the FS as a whole
  • Forgetting that for listed entities, the Auditor's Responsibilities section must explicitly state that the auditor communicates scope, timing, and significant findings to TCWG
Reference:
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic