Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit (SA 320)

## Materiality — SA 320

### What Is Materiality?

Misstatements (including omissions) are material if they, individually or in aggregate, could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users of the financial statements.

Two dimensions determine materiality:

  • Size of the misstatement
  • Nature of the misstatement (some items are material regardless of amount)

---

### SA 320 — Auditor's Responsibility

SA 320 governs the auditor's responsibility to apply materiality in:

1. Planning the audit (determining scope)

2. Performing the audit (evaluating misstatements found)

#### Assumed Profile of Financial Statement Users

The auditor assumes users:

  • Have reasonable knowledge of business, economics, and accounting
  • Understand that FS are prepared and audited to levels of materiality
  • Recognize inherent uncertainties in estimates and judgments
  • Make reasonable economic decisions based on FS information

---

### Statutory Materiality (Always Material Regardless of Amount)

If disclosure is required by law or regulation, it is always material regardless of value.

Examples under Schedule III, Companies Act 2013:

  • Any item of income/expenditure exceeding 1% of revenue from operations OR ₹1,00,000 (whichever is higher) must be disclosed separately
  • Shareholders holding more than 5% shares must be specifically disclosed with number of shares held

---

### Performance Materiality

Performance materiality = an amount lower than overall materiality set by the auditor to:

  • Reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that aggregate uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceed overall materiality
  • Provide a buffer so that individually immaterial misstatements do not collectively become material and remain undetected

> Think of it as a safety margin: Overall Materiality > Performance Materiality

---

### Benchmarks for Determining Materiality — Mnemonic: VIOLEN

Factors affecting the choice of benchmark:

LetterFactor
VVolatility of the benchmark
IIndustry and economic environment
OOwnership structure and financing (debt vs equity)
LLife cycle stage of the entity
EElements of FS (assets, liabilities, equity, revenue, expenses)
NNature of the entity

Common Benchmarks by Entity Type:

  • Profit-oriented entities → Profit Before Tax (PBT) from continuing operations
  • PBT is volatile → Use Gross Profit or Total Revenue instead
  • Debt-financed entities → Total Assets or Net Assets (users focus on asset coverage)

Relevant Financial Data for the Benchmark:

  • Prior periods' results and financial position
  • Period-to-date results
  • Budgets/forecasts for the current period
  • Adjusted for significant changes (acquisitions, industry shifts)

---

### Materiality for Particular Classes of Transactions / Balances / Disclosures

A lower threshold may apply to specific items if misstatements there could influence users even if below overall materiality. Triggers:

1. Legal/regulatory requirements — e.g., related party transactions, management remuneration

2. Key industry disclosures — e.g., R&D costs for a pharma company

3. Specific focus areas — e.g., a newly acquired business disclosed separately

---

### Revision of Materiality During the Audit

Materiality may need revision due to:

1. Change in circumstances during the audit (e.g., decision to dispose of a major business segment)

2. New information emerging

3. Revised understanding of the entity after further procedures

4. Actual results differ materially from anticipated results used to set initial materiality

If materiality is revised downward, the auditor must also assess whether:

  • Performance materiality needs revision
  • Nature, timing, and extent of further procedures remain appropriate

---

### Documentation Requirements (SA 320)

The auditor must document:

What to DocumentDetail
(a) Overall materiality for the FSAmount and factors considered
(b) Materiality for specific classes/balances/disclosuresIf applicable
(c) Performance materialityAmount set
(d) Any revision of (a)–(c)As the audit progressed

---

### Materiality and Audit Risk

Audit Risk = Risk of expressing an inappropriate audit opinion when FS are materially misstated

```

Audit Risk = Risk of Material Misstatement (RMM) × Detection Risk

RMM = Inherent Risk × Control Risk

```

Materiality and Audit Risk are considered together at three key points:

1. Identifying and assessing ROMMS

2. Determining nature, timing, and extent of further audit procedures

3. Evaluating effect of uncorrected misstatements and forming the audit opinion

Worked example

### Example 1

Example — Setting Overall Materiality:

A manufacturing company has PBT of ₹50 crores. The auditor applies a 5% benchmark → Overall Materiality = ₹2.5 crores. Performance Materiality is set at 75% of overall materiality = ₹1.875 crores. Any individual misstatement above ₹1.875 crores triggers further investigation; the buffer ensures that several smaller undetected items do not collectively exceed ₹2.5 crores.

### Example 2

Example — Statutory Materiality:

A company has revenue from operations of ₹80 lakhs. 1% = ₹80,000. But since ₹1,00,000 is higher, any income/expense item exceeding ₹1,00,000 must be separately disclosed under Schedule III. The auditor treats this as material regardless of overall materiality calculations.

### Example 3

Example — Revision of Materiality:

An auditor sets overall materiality based on budgeted PBT of ₹10 crores (materiality = ₹50 lakhs). Mid-audit, the company announces it is selling its largest division. Revised expected PBT is only ₹2 crores. The auditor revises overall materiality downward to ₹10 lakhs and reassesses whether additional procedures are needed for accounts already tested.

### Example 4

Example — Materiality for a Specific Class:

A pharmaceutical company's R&D expenditure is ₹30 lakhs, which is below the overall materiality of ₹50 lakhs. However, because R&D capitalization/expensing is a key disclosure for pharma industry investors, the auditor sets a lower specific materiality of ₹5 lakhs for R&D transactions and tests them more thoroughly.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Confusing overall materiality with performance materiality — performance materiality is always LOWER and serves as a working threshold during the audit
  • Forgetting that statutory disclosures are ALWAYS material regardless of amount — do not apply the percentage benchmark to related party transactions or management remuneration
  • Using only PBT as a benchmark for all entities — when PBT is volatile or the entity is loss-making, alternative benchmarks (gross profit, total revenue, total assets) are more appropriate
  • Treating materiality as fixed once set — it must be revised if circumstances change significantly during the audit
  • Failing to document revisions to materiality — SA 320 requires documentation of any revision and the factors that triggered it
  • Applying the same materiality threshold to specific high-sensitivity disclosures (related parties, remuneration) — these require their own lower specific materiality
Bare-Act text SA 320, Para 2 · SA 320 — Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit · click to expand
Misstatements, including omissions, are considered to be material if they, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements.
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic