Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

SA-570: Going Concern

## SA-570: Going Concern

### Basics

  • An enterprise is viewed as a Going Concern — continuing in operation for the foreseeable future.
  • Basis of Accounting:
  • If management intends to liquidate or cease operations → Liquidation Basis
  • Otherwise → Going Concern Basis (entity can discharge liabilities and realize assets in normal course of business)

---

### Indicators of Going Concern Doubt

FinancialOperatingOther
Negative cash flowsLabour unrest / strikesRegular violations of law
Huge liabilitiesLoss of key managementPending litigations and claims
Arrears of dividendsShortage of key suppliesChange in laws or government policy
Arrears of creditorsLoss of key customerUninsured catastrophes
Adverse financial ratiosLoss of market share
Default in loan repaymentEmergence of highly successful competitor
Substantial operating lossesLoss of license
Significant deterioration in asset values
Inability to comply with loan agreement terms
Change from credit to cash-on-delivery with suppliers
Inability to obtain financing for essential new products

---

### Preliminary Assessment on Going Concern

1. Management has performed assessment → Discuss with management whether events casting significant doubt on going concern have been identified.

2. Management has NOT performed assessment → Discuss with management and prompt them to perform it.

---

### Obtaining Sufficient and Appropriate Audit Evidence (SAAE)

1. Request management to make its assessment if not yet done.

2. Evaluate management's plans for future actions and assess their feasibility.

3. If a cash flow forecast is a significant factor:

a. Evaluate reliability of underlying data used to prepare the forecast.

b. Determine whether adequate support exists for the assumptions underlying the forecast.

4. Consider whether additional facts have become available since the date of assessment.

5. Request Written Representations (WR) from management and TCWG regarding future plans and feasibility.

---

### Responsibilities

Management's Responsibility — Management forms a judgement considering:

  • The degree of uncertainty increases the further into the future an event or condition occurs.
  • Size, complexity, nature, and condition of the entity and external factors affect the judgment.
  • Judgements are based on information available at the time; subsequent events may be inconsistent with earlier judgements.

Auditor's Responsibility:

1. Assess whether management's evaluation of going concern is appropriate.

2. Determine whether a material uncertainty exists about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern.

3. These responsibilities exist even if the Financial Reporting Framework (FRF) does not expressly require it.

---

### Evaluating Management's Assessment

  • The auditor is not responsible for rectifying the lack of analysis by management.
  • However, a lack of detailed analysis may not prevent the auditor from concluding on whether going concern is appropriate (e.g., where the entity has a history of profitable operations and ready access to financial resources).
  • Auditor shall evaluate the process, assumptions, and plans for future action.
  • Auditor must cover at least the same period as management, or a higher period if prescribed by law.
  • If management's assessment period is less than 12 months, the auditor must extend it to 12 months.

---

### Reporting Implications

SituationAuditor's Report
Management refuses to make preliminary assessmentModified Opinion
FS prepared on Going Concern basis but Going Concern is inappropriateAdverse Opinion
FS prepared on Liquidation basis and Going Concern is inappropriateUnmodified Opinion + EOM paragraph
Going Concern appropriate, Material Uncertainty exists, adequately disclosedUnmodified Opinion — Separate section headed "Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern" drawing attention to the note; state opinion is not modified
Going Concern appropriate, Material Uncertainty exists, NOT disclosed by managementModified Opinion (Qualified or Adverse) — Basis for Opinion paragraph states material uncertainty exists but FS do not disclose it

Worked example

### Example 1

Example 1 — Reporting Decision:

ABC Ltd. has been making losses for 3 years, its loan agreement is in default, and it cannot obtain new financing. Management prepared FS on a going concern basis but included a detailed note disclosing these events and uncertainties, along with a restructuring plan.

  • Auditor evaluates: plan is feasible, material uncertainty exists but is adequately disclosed.
  • Report: Unmodified Opinion with a separate 'Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern' section. The opinion paragraph itself is not modified.

### Example 2

Example 2 — Extending the Assessment Period:

Management prepared a going concern assessment covering only 6 months (up to September 2024 for a March 2024 year-end). The auditor must extend this to at least 12 months (i.e., March 2025) to comply with SA-570. The auditor should request management to provide projections and assumptions for the extended period and test their reliability.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Thinking the auditor is responsible for rectifying management's lack of going concern analysis — the auditor evaluates management's process but is not required to do the analysis for them.
  • Forgetting that if management's assessment covers less than 12 months, the auditor must extend it to 12 months, not just accept the shorter period.
  • Confusing reporting: when FS use liquidation basis and going concern IS inappropriate, the opinion is UNMODIFIED (with EOM) — not modified.
  • Mixing up 'Qualified vs. Adverse' when material uncertainty is not disclosed — the opinion is modified (Qualified or Adverse depending on materiality/pervasiveness), not just a disclaimer.
Reference:
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic