## SA-700: Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial Statements
### Objectives
1. To form an opinion on the FS based on evaluation of conclusions drawn from audit evidence obtained.
2. To express that opinion through a written report.
---
### Types of Financial Statements
- General Purpose Financial Statements (GPFS): Prepared as per a General Purpose Framework. Comprises:
- Summary of significant accounting policies.
- Other explanatory information.
- Any other information required by statute.
General Purpose Framework is either:
| Framework Type | Key Feature |
|---|---|
| Compliance Framework | Requires compliance with the framework |
| Fair Presentation Framework | Requires compliance AND acknowledges that: (a) Management may provide disclosures beyond those required to achieve fair presentation; (b) Management may depart from framework requirements to achieve fair presentation (explicitly acknowledged) |
---
### Evaluations Before Forming Opinion
#### Qualitative Aspects of Accounting Practices
- Management makes judgements while preparing FS (per SA-260 discussions).
- Auditor must consider possible management bias together with uncorrected misstatements.
- Check for lack of neutrality — indicators include:
- Selective correction of misstatements brought to management's attention.
- Management bias involving accounting estimates (also per SA-540).
#### Specific Evaluations
1. Proper disclosure of significant accounting policies.
2. Proper disclosure of material transactions and events.
3. Information is relevant, reliable, comparable, and understandable.
4. Accounting policies are appropriate and consistent.
5. Accounting estimates are reasonable.
6. Terminology (including titles of each FS) is appropriate.
#### Conclusions the Auditor Must Consider
1. Whether SAAE has been obtained.
2. Whether uncorrected misstatements are material.
3. The results of the specific evaluations above.
---
### Elements of the Auditor's Report
| Element | Key Requirements |
|---|---|
| Title | Must clearly state it is the report of an Independent Auditor: "Independent Auditor's Report" |
| Addressee | Based on circumstances, law, regulations, and terms of engagement. Normally: shareholders (company) or TCWG (firm/LLP) |
| Opinion | Part 1: Identify entity audited; state FS have been audited; identify each statement comprising the FS; refer to notes and summary of significant accounting policies; specify the date and period covered. E.g., "We have audited the financial statements of Baba Ltd. which comprise the Balance Sheet, P&L A/c, SOCE, Cash Flow Statement and notes for the year ended 31st March, 2024." Part 2 — Unmodified Opinion: For Fair Presentation Framework: "In our opinion, the accompanying financial statements present fairly in all material respects in accordance with [FRF]" OR "...give a true and fair view in accordance with [FRF]" — these phrases are equivalent. For Compliance Framework: "The accompanying financial statements are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with [FRF]" |
| Basis for Opinion | States: (1) Audit conducted per SAs; (2) SAAE obtained; (3) Auditor is independent per relevant ethical requirements; (4) Reference to section describing auditor's responsibilities under SAs |
| Key Audit Matters | Refer SA-701 |
| Going Concern | States FS prepared on going concern basis; auditor obtained SAAE on appropriateness. If material uncertainty exists — auditor ensures adequate disclosure for fair presentation (FPF) or that FS are not misleading (compliance framework) |
| Other Information | Refer SA-720 |
| Responsibilities of Management | (1) Preparing FS as per FRF; (2) Framing internal controls so FS are free from MM; (3) Assessing ability to continue as going concern. Based on SA-200 and agreed upon per SA-210 (engagement letter) |
| Responsibilities of Auditor | Part 1: (a) Objectives: obtain reasonable assurance FS are free from MM; issue auditor's report including opinion. (b) Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but NOT a guarantee. (c) Misstatement is material if it could influence economic decisions of users. Part 2: Compliance with SAs |