# SA 450: Evaluation of Misstatements Identified During the Audit
## Objectives of the Auditor
To evaluate:
1. The effect of identified misstatements on the audit
2. The effect of uncorrected misstatements on the financial statements
> Foundational rule: The auditor shall accumulate all misstatements identified during the audit, except those that are clearly trivial.
---
## Considering Misstatements As the Audit Progresses
The auditor must determine whether to revise the overall audit strategy and audit plan when:
| Trigger | Reason |
|---|---|
| Nature and circumstances of identified misstatements suggest other misstatements may exist | Aggregate could be material |
| Aggregate of accumulated misstatements is approaching materiality (per SA 320) | Risk that FS are materially misstated |
### Requesting Management to Examine
- The auditor may request management to examine a class of transactions, account balance, or disclosure to understand the cause of a misstatement and make appropriate adjustments
- If management corrects misstatements following the auditor's request → auditor must perform additional audit procedures to determine whether misstatements remain
---
## Evaluating Uncorrected Misstatements
The auditor determines whether uncorrected misstatements are material, individually or in aggregate.
Factors to consider:
1. Size and nature of the misstatements — in relation to:
- Particular classes of transactions, account balances, or disclosures
- The FS as a whole
2. Particular circumstances of their occurrence
> (Note: This topic continues beyond the available extract — further evaluation criteria and communication requirements for uncorrected misstatements are covered in the full SA 450 text.)