Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

SA-320: Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit

## SA-320: Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit

### Concept of Materiality

Misstatements (including omissions) are material if they, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users of the financial statements.

Materiality judgments are affected by:

  • Size of the misstatement
  • Nature of the misstatement
  • Or a combination of both

---

### Assumptions About Users

The auditor reasonably assumes that users:

1. Have reasonable knowledge of business, economics, and accounting, and study FS with reasonable diligence

2. Understand that FS are prepared, presented, and audited to levels of materiality

3. Recognize inherent uncertainties in measurement, estimates, and future events

4. Make reasonable economic decisions based on FS information

---

### Stages of Materiality

Materiality is applied at three stages:

1. Planning the audit

2. Performing audit procedures

3. Forming the opinion in the auditor's report

At the planning stage, materiality judgments determine:

  • NTE of Risk Assessment Procedures
  • NTE of Further Audit Procedures
  • Identification of RMMs

---

### Performance Materiality

> Performance materiality is set lower than overall materiality for the FS as a whole.

Why? Because individually immaterial items may collectively become material when aggregated.

AspectDetail
BasisProfessional judgment
EffectReduces the risk of smaller misstatements going undetected
Practical impactResults in a larger sample size
Items above PM but below overall materialityAuditor performs limited procedures

---

### Relationship: Audit Risk vs. Materiality

Materiality LevelExtent of ProceduresAudit Risk
HighMore extensiveDecreases ↓
LowLess extensiveIncreases ↑

Inverse relationship between materiality and audit risk.

Considered throughout the audit, particularly when:

  • Identifying and assessing RMM
  • Determining NTE of FAP
  • Evaluating effect of uncorrected misstatements
  • Forming the opinion in the auditor's report

---

### Determining Materiality — Key Principle

Planning materiality does not automatically make everything below it immaterial. The auditor must consider:

  • Size of misstatement
  • Nature of misstatement
  • Circumstances of occurrence

Some misstatements below the threshold may still be evaluated as material based on their nature.

---

### Revision of Materiality

If new information comes to light during the audit that would have led to a different initial materiality, the auditor must revise:

1. Materiality for FS as a whole

2. Performance materiality (if revised materiality is lower)

3. NTE of Further Audit Procedures

---

### Benchmarking

A percentage applied to a chosen benchmark is the starting point.

Factors in selecting the right benchmark:

FactorConsideration
Element of FSAssets, liabilities, expenses
User focusProfit/revenue for performance evaluation
Ownership structureDebt-financed → users focus on assets; equity-financed → focus on earnings
Entity lifecycle & environmentGrowth vs. mature entity
Volatility of benchmarkIf PBT is volatile, use gross profit or total revenues instead

Typical percentage benchmarks:

  • Profit-oriented entity: ~5% of Profit Before Tax
  • Not-for-profit entity: ~1% of total revenue or total expenses

> Note: Percentage applied to PBT is normally higher than percentage applied to total revenue (because revenue is a far larger base number).

Financial data used for benchmarking:

  • Prior period financial results and financial positions
  • Period-to-date results and budgets/forecasts for the current period
  • Adjusted for significant changes (e.g., a business acquisition) and industry/economic environment changes

---

### Materiality for Specific Classes, Balances, or Disclosures

Lower (item-specific) materiality thresholds apply when:

1. Law or FRF affects user expectations regarding specific items (e.g., RPTs, managerial remuneration)

2. Key industry disclosures are involved (e.g., R&D expenses in a pharmaceutical company)

3. A particular aspect of the business is separately disclosed in the FS (e.g., newly acquired business)

---

### Documentation Requirements

The auditor must document:

a. Materiality for the FS as a whole

b. Materiality for specific classes/balances/disclosures (if applicable)

c. Performance materiality

d. Any revision of (a) to (c) as the audit progressed

Worked example

### Example 1

An auditor is planning the audit of a listed company with PBT of ₹50 lakhs. Applying a 5% benchmark: Overall Materiality = ₹2.5 lakhs. Performance Materiality is set at ₹1.75 lakhs (70% of overall). An individual item of ₹2 lakhs is above performance materiality but below overall materiality — the auditor performs limited procedures on this item rather than full substantive testing.

### Example 2

A pharmaceutical company has total revenues of ₹500 crores. Its R&D expenditure of ₹8 crores (1.6% of revenue) is below calculated overall materiality. However, since R&D disclosure is a key industry metric closely watched by investors and analysts, the auditor applies a lower item-specific materiality threshold to this disclosure. This is appropriate under SA-320 because the nature of the item affects user decisions.

### Example 3

During the audit, the auditor discovers that revenue is overstated by ₹1.4 lakhs due to premature recognition — just below the overall planning materiality of ₹1.5 lakhs. However, since the misstatement is intentional (fraudulent intent) and affects revenue — a key metric users focus on — the auditor evaluates it as material despite being below the threshold. SA-320 requires consideration of both size AND nature/circumstances.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Treating performance materiality as a fixed percentage (e.g., always 75%) of overall materiality — it depends on professional judgment and risk assessment
  • Assuming that anything below planning materiality is automatically immaterial — nature and circumstances of misstatements must also be evaluated
  • Getting the inverse relationship backward: higher materiality does NOT mean less audit work — it means MORE work (higher NTE of procedures) so that audit risk is reduced
  • Forgetting that materiality must be REVISED during the audit when new information comes to light
  • Not knowing when to apply item-specific (lower) materiality — applicable for legally sensitive disclosures (RPTs, remuneration), key industry metrics (R&D in pharma), and separately disclosed items
Bare-Act text Definition of Materiality (Para 2) · SA 320 · click to expand
Misstatements, including omissions, are considered to be material if they, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements.
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic