Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

SA 701 – Communicating Key Audit Matters (KAM) in the Auditor's Report

## SA 701 – Key Audit Matters (KAM)

### What are KAM?

Key Audit Matters are those matters that, in the auditor's professional judgment, were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period. They are selected from matters communicated with those charged with governance (TCWG).

---

### Applicability

KAM communication is required for:

1. Listed entities (mandatory).

2. Situations where the auditor otherwise decides to communicate KAM in the report.

3. Where required by law or regulation.

> Critical Exception: The auditor cannot communicate KAM when issuing a Disclaimer of Opinion or Adverse Opinion — unless law or regulation requires it.

---

### What KAM Communication is NOT

KAM reporting does not substitute for:

  • Disclosures that management is required to make in the FS.
  • A modified opinion when circumstances require one (SA 705).
  • Going concern reporting when a material uncertainty exists (SA 570).
  • A separate opinion on individual matters.

---

### Purpose of KAM

  • Enhance the communicative value of the auditor's report through greater transparency.
  • Help users understand the entity and areas of significant management judgment.
  • Highlight matters of most significance to the current period audit.

---

### Determining KAM — Three Filters

1. Higher assessed risk of material misstatement or significant risks (SA 315).

2. Significant auditor judgment in areas involving significant management judgment (e.g., complex accounting estimates).

3. Effect of significant events or transactions that occurred during the period.

---

### How to Communicate KAM in the Report

  • Describe each KAM in a separate section under the heading "Key Audit Matters", using an appropriate sub-heading per matter.
  • The introductory language must state:
  • (a) KAM are matters of most significance in the current period audit.
  • (b) These matters were addressed in the context of the overall audit and forming the opinion — the auditor does not provide a separate opinion on these matters.

Worked example

### Example 1

Example 1 – Identifying KAM: During the audit of a real estate company, the auditor identifies revenue recognition from long-term construction contracts as an area involving significant management judgment (percentage-of-completion estimates). This qualifies as a KAM under Filter 2 (significant management/auditor judgment).

### Example 2

Example 2 – KAM applicability: M/s Sunrise Ltd. is a listed entity. Its auditor must communicate KAM. However, during the audit, the auditor is unable to obtain SAAE on a pervasive matter and issues a Disclaimer of Opinion. In this case, the KAM section must be omitted from the report (unless law requires it).

### Example 3

Example 3 – KAM is not a substitute: The auditor identifies a significant uncertainty about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern. Simply reporting this as a KAM is insufficient — the auditor must apply SA 570 reporting requirements (and issue a KAM only in addition to, not instead of, that reporting).

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Treating KAM as a separate opinion on individual matters — KAM is not a separate opinion, it is a description of audit focus areas.
  • Including a KAM section in a Disclaimer of Opinion report (not permitted unless required by law).
  • Confusing KAM selection source: KAM must be selected from matters already communicated with TCWG — not independently chosen for the report.
  • Using KAM reporting as a substitute for a modified opinion or going concern reporting.
  • Not including the mandatory introductory language that KAM do not constitute separate opinions.
Reference:
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic