# Variation of Rights of Shareholders

## Core Idea

When a company alters the rights attached to a particular class of shares, those affected shareholders must consent. The law gives them both a forward gate (consent requirement) and a backward door (right to apply to NCLT) to protect their interests.

## 1. How Rights Can Be Varied

### (a) Consent Threshold

Rights of a class of shares can be varied if:

Consent is obtained from at least 3/4th of holders of issued shares of that class (in writing), OR
A Special Resolution (SR) is passed in a separate meeting of that class.

### (b) Source of Power to Vary

Variation is permitted only if:

Provisions for variation are included in the MOA or AOA, OR
In their absence, variation is not prohibited by the terms of issue of the shares.

### (c) Impact on Another Class

If variation of one class affects the rights of another class, the consent of 3/4th of that other class is also required.

## 2. Dissenting Shareholders — Right to Approach NCLT

The 3/4th consent does not silence the minority forever.

Holders of 10% or more of issued shares of the affected class who did not consent may apply to NCLT to cancel the variation.
The application must be made within 21 days from the date consent was given or the resolution was passed.
The Tribunal's order is binding on all shareholders of the class.
The company must file a copy of the Tribunal's order with the ROC within 30 days.

## 3. What is NOT a Variation

Two specific situations are expressly carved out:

### (a) Pari-passu New Preference Shares

Issuing new preference shares pari-passu (on equal footing) with existing preference shares does not require the consent of existing preference shareholders.

### (b) Cancellation / Reduction

Cancellation of shares or reduction of share capital does not amount to variation of class rights.

## Memory Hook

3/4th in — to vary
10% out — to cancel the variation through NCLT
21 days to apply, 30 days to file order with ROC

Worked example

### Example 1

Example 1: A company holds a separate meeting of preference shareholders and passes a special resolution to reduce the fixed dividend rate from 9% to 7%. 80% of the PSH vote in favour. Is the variation valid?

Answer: Yes. The SR was passed in a separate class meeting with more than 3/4th support. Variation is valid — subject to the dissenting 20% being able to approach NCLT within 21 days if they hold at least 10%.

### Example 2

Example 2: A company issues fresh preference shares carrying the same rights as existing preference shares. The existing PSH protest, claiming variation of rights.

Answer: Issue of new preference shares pari-passu with existing ones is not a variation. No consent of existing PSH is required.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

Treating the 3/4th threshold as 3/4th of those present and voting — it is actually 3/4th of the holders of issued shares of that class (or SR in a separate meeting).
Forgetting that the 10% NCLT-application right is for non-consenting shareholders, not all shareholders.
Confusing reduction of capital with variation — they are distinct concepts. Reduction is not variation.
Missing the 21-day window for NCLT application — it runs from the date of consent/resolution, not from the date of variation.

Bare-Act text Section 48 · Companies Act, 2013 · click to expand

Section 48 — Variation of Shareholders' Rights: (1) Where a share capital of the company is divided into different classes of shares, the rights attached to the shares of any class may be varied with the consent in writing of the holders of not less than three-fourths of the issued shares of that class or by means of a special resolution passed at a separate meeting of the holders of the issued shares of that class...

Now that you've read this — what's next?

Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.

🔥 Drill 5 Qs on this → ✍️ Adaptive practice →

Variation of Rights of Shareholders (Section 48)

Worked example

⚠️ Common exam mistakes