Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

FIFO and LIFO Methods of Material Issue Valuation

## FIFO — First-In, First-Out

Principle: Materials are issued in the order they were received — oldest stock goes out first.

### Price Used for Issues

The price of the earliest (oldest) batch in stock.

### Suitability

  • Falling prices: Old (higher) price charged to production; replacement cost is lower → production cost is realistically charged.
  • Rising prices: Old (lower) price charged to production → cost is understated; profit is overstated.

### Advantages and Disadvantages

AdvantageDisadvantage
Simple to understand and operateClerical errors likely when prices fluctuate often
In falling prices, closing stock reflects near-current market priceIn rising prices, low charged cost → unreasonably high reported profit → higher income tax
Balance sheet not distorted (closing stock at recent prices)

---

## LIFO — Last-In, First-Out

Principle: Most recently received materials are issued first — newest stock goes out first.

### Price Used for Issues

The price of the latest (newest) batch received → always close to current market price.

### Suitability

  • Rising prices: Issued cost reflects current market cost → realistic production cost and income measurement.

### Advantages and Disadvantages

AdvantageDisadvantage
Production cost reflects current market pricesClerical errors likely with frequent price changes
In inflation: lower reported profit → avoids paying undue taxesDifferent jobs may carry different material costs for the same item
In falling prices: issued cost falls → product becomes price-competitiveIn falling prices: closing stock may need write-down to lower of cost or NRV
Closing stock valued at OLD prices → balance sheet distorted
Income tax authorities do not accept LIFO (closing stock ≠ current market value)

---

## FIFO vs LIFO — Quick Comparison

FeatureFIFOLIFO
Issues orderOldest firstNewest first
Closing stock valueRecent / current pricesOlder prices
COGS includesOlder purchase costsRecent purchase costs
Balance sheet representationAccurate (not distorted)Distorted
Rising prices → Reported incomeHigher (old low cost vs. current revenue)Lower (current high cost vs. current revenue)
Tax impact in inflationHigher tax liabilityLower tax liability
Accepted by Indian IT authoritiesYesNo

Worked example

### Example 1

FIFO vs LIFO in Rising Prices:

Purchases: Batch 1 — 100 units @ ₹10; Batch 2 — 100 units @ ₹15.

Issue: 100 units.

FIFO: Issues 100 units from Batch 1 @ ₹10 → Material cost = ₹1,000; Closing stock = 100 units @ ₹15 (current price).

LIFO: Issues 100 units from Batch 2 @ ₹15 → Material cost = ₹1,500; Closing stock = 100 units @ ₹10 (old price).

If selling price = ₹20/unit (revenue = ₹2,000):

  • FIFO Profit = 2,000 − 1,000 = ₹1,000 (higher → more tax)
  • LIFO Profit = 2,000 − 1,500 = ₹500 (lower → tax saving)

Note: LIFO closing stock (₹1,000) is understated vs FIFO closing stock (₹1,500) → balance sheet distortion.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Confusing which method suits rising vs falling prices: FIFO suits falling prices (gives realistic high cost charge); LIFO suits rising prices (gives current cost charge).
  • Thinking FIFO overstates closing stock — FIFO gives the most current/accurate closing stock value, not an overstated one.
  • Forgetting that LIFO is not accepted by Indian income tax authorities, regardless of its costing merit.
  • Assuming higher profit is always better — in the context of inflation, FIFO's higher profit creates a higher tax burden on unrealised holding gains.
Reference:
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic