Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

Evaluation of Internal Controls by the Auditor — Methods

## Evaluation of Internal Controls by the Auditor

### Why the Auditor Evaluates IC

The auditor evaluates IC to determine:

  • Nature, timing, and extent of other audit procedures
  • Whether errors and frauds are likely to surface in ordinary operations
  • Whether an adequate IC system is in use and operating as planned
  • Whether an effective internal auditing department is operating
  • Whether administrative controls have a bearing on audit work
  • Whether controls adequately safeguard assets
  • How reliably management is recording transactions
  • How reliable reports, records, and certificates provided to management are
  • Areas where control is weak or excessive
  • Suggestions to improve the control system

---

### Methods of Evaluating Internal Controls

#### 1. Narrative Record

> A complete and exhaustive written description of the system as found in operation by the auditor.

  • Best for simple systems
  • Time-consuming for complex systems

#### 2. Checklist

> A series of instructions and/or questions that audit staff must answer or follow.

  • Standardises evaluation across engagements
  • Risk: mechanical compliance without genuine analysis

#### 3. Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)

> A comprehensive series of questions concerning IC — covering existence, operation, and efficiency.

  • Most widely used method
  • Designed so that a 'No' answer signals a weakness
  • Covers all areas systematically

#### 4. Flow Chart

> A graphic representation of each part of the company's system of IC.

  • Visually maps transaction flows and control points
  • Easy to identify missing controls or redundant controls
  • Best for complex, multi-department processes

---

### Comparison Table

MethodFormatBest ForLimitation
Narrative RecordWritten proseSimple systemsCumbersome for complex systems
ChecklistYes/No questionsStandardisationRisk of mechanical use
ICQStructured questionnaireComprehensive coverage'No' = weakness convention must be understood
Flow ChartDiagramsComplex processesRequires diagramming skill

Worked example

### Example 1

ICQ Example: Question: 'Is there a separation of duties between the person who authorises purchases and the person who issues cheques?' → If answered 'No', it immediately flags a control weakness in the purchases-to-payment cycle.

### Example 2

Flow Chart Example: An auditor maps the sales cycle from order receipt → credit approval → dispatch → invoicing → collection. The flow chart reveals that the same person both raises invoices and records receipts — a missing segregation-of-duties control is instantly visible.

### Example 3

Narrative Record Example: For a 5-person company, the auditor writes: 'The owner approves all purchase orders above ₹10,000. Payments are made only after matching the purchase order, delivery note, and supplier invoice. The owner signs all cheques personally.' This narrative fully describes the IC over purchases.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Thinking only one method must be used — in practice, auditors combine methods (e.g., ICQ for initial review + flow chart for complex cycles).
  • In ICQ, designing questions where 'Yes' = weakness (ICQ convention is that 'No' = weakness; all questions should be framed accordingly).
  • Using a narrative record for large, complex entities — this creates an unmanageably long document and misses visual control gaps that a flow chart would reveal.
  • Treating the checklist as a substitute for professional judgment — checking boxes without actually verifying operations defeats the purpose.
Reference:
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic