## SA 610: When Can the External Auditor Use Internal Auditors for Direct Assistance?
### What Is Direct Assistance?
Direct assistance means using internal audit staff to directly perform specific audit procedures on behalf of the external auditor (not just reviewing the internal audit function's work, but actually having internal auditors do audit work).
### The Prohibition for Higher Risk Areas
SA 610 establishes a critical restriction:
> The external auditor shall not use internal auditors to provide direct assistance for procedures that relate to higher assessed risks of material misstatement where the judgment required is more than limited.
### Why This Restriction Exists
- Higher risk areas demand more experienced, independent judgment
- Internal auditors are employees of the entity — their independence is inherently limited
- The external auditor must retain direct control over the most sensitive and judgment-intensive work
### Applying the Test: 'More Than Limited' Judgment
The key question is whether the task requires more than limited judgment:
| Task | Judgment Required | Internal Auditor Assistance Permitted? |
|---|---|---|
| Checking accuracy of aging of receivables | Limited (mechanical arithmetic check) | Yes — permitted |
| Evaluating adequacy of provision based on aging | More than limited (requires credit risk judgment, going concern assessment, management estimates) | No — not permitted |
### Decision Framework
```
Is the area higher risk? → No → Generally, direct assistance is permissible
↓ Yes
Does the specific task require more than limited judgment?
→ No → Direct assistance permissible
→ Yes → External auditor must perform this personally
```