## Reporting on Going Concern Material Uncertainty (SA 570)
### The Scenario
When events or conditions cast significant doubt on an entity's ability to continue as a going concern, and adequate disclosure is made in the financial statements, the auditor follows a specific reporting protocol.
### When Adequate Disclosure IS Made — The Protocol
Step 1 — Opinion: Express an unmodified opinion (the disclosure is adequate, so there is no misstatement to qualify on)
Step 2 — Separate Section: Include a separate section in the auditor's report with the heading:
> "Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern"
Contents of the section:
- (a) Draw attention to the specific note in the financial statements that fully discloses the events/conditions
- (b) State explicitly that the events or conditions "indicate that a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the entity's ability to continue as a going concern"
- (c) State that the auditor's opinion is not modified in respect of this matter
### Key Logic
The going concern section is structurally similar to EOM but is mandatory (not discretionary) when the going concern uncertainty meets the threshold. EOM is a judgement call; going concern reporting under SA 570 is required by the standard when the conditions are met.
### Contrast: When Adequate Disclosure is NOT Made
If management fails to make adequate disclosure, the going concern uncertainty becomes a misstatement → the auditor must issue a modified opinion (usually Adverse, since inadequate disclosure on going concern is likely pervasive).