Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

SA 710 – Comparative Information: Audit Procedures and Corresponding Figures

## SA 710 – Comparative Information

### What Is Comparative Information?

Financial statements typically include figures from the prior period alongside current-period figures so users can assess trends. SA 710 governs how the auditor handles this comparative information.

Two approaches exist:

  • Corresponding Figures – Prior-period amounts are an integral part of current-period FS and are read only in relation to current-period figures. The level of detail is dictated by relevance to the current period.
  • Comparative Financial Statements – Prior-period FS are presented separately; each period's FS stands independently.

---

### Auditor's Procedures on Comparative Information

CheckWhat the auditor does
CompletenessVerify FS includes all comparative information required by the AFRF
ConsistencyConfirm comparative amounts agree with amounts disclosed in the prior period
Policy alignmentConfirm accounting policies are consistent with the current period

If a possible misstatement is detected in comparative information during the current audit:

1. Perform additional procedures to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence (SAAE).

2. If the prior period was audited by the same auditor, follow SA 560 procedures.

Written Representations (SA 580):

Obtain written representations covering all periods referred to in the auditor's opinion. If a specific prior period is disclosed, obtain a separate written representation for that period.

---

### Corresponding Figures – When the Auditor's Opinion Refers to Them

The auditor's opinion ordinarily does not refer to corresponding figures. Exceptions:

Exception 1 – Unresolved prior-period modification

If the prior audit report contained a qualified, adverse, or disclaimer opinion, and the matter remains unresolved, the auditor modifies the current opinion and in the Basis for Modification paragraph either:

  • References both current-period and corresponding figures (if effects on current period are material), or
  • Explains that the opinion is modified due to comparability impact.

Exception 2 – Material misstatement discovered in prior period (previously unmodified)

If the auditor finds a material misstatement exists in the prior period on which an unmodified report was issued, and the misstatement has not been corrected, the auditor expresses a qualified or adverse opinion on the corresponding figures.

Exception 3 – Prior period FS not audited

State in an Other Matter Paragraph (OMP) that corresponding figures are unaudited. This does not relieve the auditor of the obligation to obtain SAAE that opening balances are free from material misstatement.

Exception 4 – Prior period audited by predecessor auditor

State in OMP:

1. The FS were audited by a predecessor auditor.

2. The type of opinion issued and, if modified, the reasons.

3. The date of the predecessor's report.

---

### Situations Involving a Predecessor Auditor

SituationAuditor's Action
Auditor's opinion on prior period differs from predecessor's opinionDisclose reason for difference in OMP per SA 706
MM found in prior period – predecessor issued unmodified reportCommunicate with TCWG; request predecessor be informed; if predecessor issues a new report on amended FS, current auditor reports only on the current period
Prior period FS not auditedState in OMP that corresponding figures are unaudited

Worked example

### Example 1

Example 1 – Unresolved prior modification:

In FY 2024 the auditor issued a qualified opinion because inventory valuation was uncertain. In FY 2025 the same uncertainty persists. The auditor must modify the FY 2025 opinion and in the Basis for Modification paragraph reference both the FY 2025 closing inventory and the FY 2024 corresponding figure, because the effect on current-period figures is material.

### Example 2

Example 2 – Predecessor auditor scenario:

XYZ Ltd.'s FY 2024 FS were audited by Auditor A (predecessor). In FY 2025 Auditor B is appointed. Auditor B must include an OMP in the FY 2025 report stating: (a) FY 2024 FS were audited by Auditor A, (b) Auditor A issued an unmodified opinion, (c) the date of Auditor A's report was 15 June 2024.

### Example 3

Example 3 – Prior period unaudited:

A company presents FY 2024 figures as comparatives, but those were never audited. Auditor must include an OMP stating the comparatives are unaudited. The auditor must still check that opening balances contain no material misstatement – the OMP statement does NOT eliminate this obligation.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Assuming the OMP disclaimer for unaudited comparatives removes the auditor's obligation to check opening balances for material misstatements – it does not.
  • Forgetting to obtain written representations for all periods referred to in the opinion, not just the current period.
  • Confusing 'corresponding figures' (read only in relation to current period) with 'comparative financial statements' (each period stands independently) – the reporting treatment differs.
  • Not disclosing the predecessor auditor's report details (opinion type, reasons for modification, date) when prior FS were audited by a predecessor.
  • Failing to communicate with TCWG when a material misstatement is found in the prior period that the predecessor had not flagged.
Bare-Act text SA 320, Para 2 · SA 320 – Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit · click to expand
Misstatements, including omissions, are material if they, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements.
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic