Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

SA 200 – Scope of Audit, Fraud Detection and Audit vs Investigation

## Scope of Audit and Fraud Detection (SA 200)

### What Does the Auditor Actually Examine?

1. Whether transactions and events are properly summarized in the financial statements.

2. Whether management's accounting policy choices are appropriate and consistently applied period-to-period.

3. Whether relevant information is properly disclosed, keeping applicable statutory requirements in mind.

### Auditor's Objective on Fraud (SA 200)

The auditor's objective is to obtain reasonable assurance that financial statements are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. This is not the same as:

  • Conducting an official investigation into alleged wrongdoing, OR
  • Guaranteeing detection of all fraud.

The auditor has no special legal powers — no power to search premises, no power to record sworn statements of witnesses.

> A clause in an appointment letter making the auditor "responsible for detecting all frauds" is outside the scope of audit and must be objected to.

### Audit vs Investigation — Key Differences

FeatureAuditInvestigation
PurposeGeneral examination; form an opinion on F/SSpecific purpose (e.g., detect suspected fraud)
ScopeBroad and generalNarrow and specific
AppointmentStatutory / routine client appointmentSpecial purpose appointment
Legal powersNoneMay carry special powers
InitiativeMandatory (statute) or contractualTriggered by suspicion or special need

Practical test: If the task has a specific, narrow purpose (e.g., "check if employees are making fraudulent payments to dummy workers"), it is an investigation — not an audit — regardless of what the company calls it.

Worked example

### Example 1

Q: PD & Co. are appointed as statutory auditors of MR Ltd. The appointment letter includes: "The Auditor shall be responsible for detecting the frauds that may happen in the company during FY 2023-24." The auditors object. Are they right?

A: Yes. The auditor's objective under SA 200 is to obtain reasonable assurance that financial statements are free from material misstatement — not to detect all fraud. An audit is not an official investigation; the auditor has no special legal powers to search or record sworn statements. This clause is outside the scope of audit and the objection is valid.

### Example 2

Q: Cool Drinks Ltd suspects some employees are making fraudulent payments to dummy workers across its plants. It appoints auditors for a detailed examination of accounts. Board member Mr. P objects to calling this an 'audit'. Is he right?

A: Yes, Mr. P is correct. This assignment has a specific, narrow purpose — to detect suspected fraudulent payments. This is the hallmark of an investigation, not an audit. An audit is broad in scope and does not have a specific predetermined conclusion to find. The correct term for this assignment is 'investigation'.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • Treating fraud detection as the primary objective of an audit — the primary objective is reasonable assurance on material misstatements, not a fraud investigation.
  • Confusing audit (broad, general) with investigation (specific, narrow) — the key distinguishing test is whether the assignment has a specific predetermined purpose.
  • Thinking the auditor has legal powers to compel witnesses or search records — an auditor has no such powers; only special investigators do.
  • Forgetting that the auditor evaluates consistency of accounting policies across periods, not just whether the current year policy is appropriate.
Reference:
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic