## SA 610: When the External Auditor Cannot Use Internal Auditors for Direct Assistance
SA 610 allows the external auditor (EA) to use the internal auditor (IA) for direct assistance — but with firm restrictions.
---
### Absolute Prohibitions: Do NOT Use IA if…
| Condition | Reason |
|---|---|
| Significant threats to IA's objectivity exist | IA cannot remain unbiased |
| IA lacks sufficient competency for the proposed work | Quality of output is unreliable |
Both conditions must be clear before the EA can proceed at all.
---
### Procedures IA Must Never Perform (Even if Eligible)
Even where IA is objective and competent, the EA cannot ask IA to perform procedures that:
1. Involve significant judgements in the audit
2. Relate to higher assessed risk of material misstatement (more sensitive areas)
3. Relate to work already reported — or to be reported — to management or TCWG by the IA function (creates a conflict of oversight)
4. Relate to the EA's own decisions about the IA function and use of IA's work
> Memory hook – SHRJ: Significant judgements | Higher risk | Reported to TCWG | Jurisdictional decisions of EA
---
### Pre-Conditions Before Using IA: Two Written Agreements
Prior to using IA for direct assistance, the EA must obtain:
| Agreement from | Content |
|---|---|
| Authorised representative of the entity | (a) IA will follow EA's instructions; (b) Entity will not intervene in IA's work |
| Internal Auditor (personally) | (a) Will keep matters confidential as instructed by EA; (b) Will inform EA of any threat to their objectivity |
> Written agreements protect the EA's control over the audit and guard against management pressure on the IA.