Launch offer — 25% off with code LAUNCH-25 See plans →
Microlesson · 5-min read

AS 12 — Monetary Grants for Depreciable Fixed Assets (Two Methods)

## Monetary Grants Relating to Depreciable Fixed Assets (PPE)

When a cash grant is received for purchasing or constructing a depreciable fixed asset, AS 12 permits two alternative methods.

---

### Method 1 — Reduce Grant from Cost of Asset

The grant is directly deducted from the gross cost of the asset. Depreciation is charged on the net (reduced) cost.

Journal Entries:

EventEntry
Purchase assetPPE A/c Dr [full cost] → To Bank
Receive grantBank A/c Dr [grant] → To PPE A/c [grant]
Annual depreciationDeprn A/c Dr → To PPE A/c (on net cost)
P&LP&L A/c Dr → To Deprn A/c

Net value of PPE = Gross Cost − Grant − Accumulated Depreciation on net cost

The grant benefit reaches P&L indirectly through reduced annual depreciation.

---

### Method 2 — Deferred Government Grant (DGG)

The asset is recorded at full gross cost. The grant is credited to "Deferred Government Grant" (DGG) — a deferred income account. Each year, a proportionate share of DGG is released to P&L as Other Income, matching the period's depreciation.

Journal Entries:

EventEntry
Purchase assetPPE A/c Dr [full cost] → To Bank
Receive grantBank A/c Dr [grant] → To DGG A/c
Annual depreciationDeprn A/c Dr → To PPE A/c (on full cost)
DGG releaseDGG A/c Dr [proportionate] → To P&L (Other Income)
P&LP&L A/c Dr → To Deprn A/c

DGG transfer (SLM): Grant ÷ Asset Life per year (equal installments)

DGG transfer (WDV): Remaining DGG × WDV rate % per year

The grant benefit appears explicitly in P&L as Other Income each year.

---

### Comparing the Two Methods

AspectMethod 1 (Reduce from Cost)Method 2 (DGG)
Asset in booksNet cost (cost − grant)Full gross cost
Depreciation baseNet costFull gross cost
Grant in P&LIndirectly (lower deprn)Directly as Other Income
Balance sheet itemNoneDGG (deferred income)
Net P&L impactIdenticalIdentical

Both methods produce the same net P&L impact — they differ only in presentation.

---

### Effect on Depreciation Reported

This is critical in exams: Method 1 shows lower depreciation; Method 2 shows higher depreciation (but offset by Other Income). Same bottom line, different line items.

Worked example

### Example 1

Head-to-head comparison: Building purchased for ₹10 crore, Government grant ₹6 crore, Life 10 years (SLM, no salvage value).

Method 1:

  • Net cost = 10 − 6 = ₹4 cr
  • Annual Deprn = 4 / 10 = ₹0.4 cr
  • P&L: Deprn ₹0.4 cr (net charge = ₹0.4 cr)

Method 2:

  • Building at ₹10 cr; DGG = ₹6 cr
  • Annual Deprn = 10 / 10 = ₹1 cr
  • DGG release = 6 / 10 = ₹0.6 cr (Other Income)
  • Net P&L charge = 1.0 − 0.6 = ₹0.4 cr ← Same as Method 1 ✓

### Example 2

Journal entries for both methods: PPE purchased ₹50L, Grant ₹10L, Salvage ₹5L, Life 5 years (SLM).

Method 1 — Year 1:

```

PPE A/c Dr 50L

To Bank 50L

Bank A/c Dr 10L

To PPE A/c 10L [Net PPE = 40L]

Deprn A/c Dr 7L [(40−5)/5 = 7]

To PPE A/c 7L

P&L A/c Dr 7L

To Deprn A/c 7L

```

Method 2 — Year 1:

```

PPE A/c Dr 50L

To Bank 50L

Bank A/c Dr 10L

To DGG A/c 10L

Deprn A/c Dr 9L [(50−5)/5 = 9]

To PPE A/c 9L

DGG A/c Dr 2L [10/5 = 2]

To P&L OtherIncome 2L

P&L A/c Dr 9L

To Deprn A/c 9L

```

Net P&L charge under Method 2 = 9 − 2 = ₹7L ← Same as Method 1 ✓

### Example 3

WDV illustration (Method 1): Machine purchased 01.09.2016, Cost ₹300L, Grant ₹60L deducted from cost, WDV @ 10%.

Net cost = 300 − 60 = ₹240L

DateWorkingCarrying Amount (₹L)
01.09.2016Net cost240.000
31.03.2017Less Deprn: 240 × 10%216.000
31.03.2018Less Deprn: 216 × 10%194.400
31.03.2019Less Deprn: 194.4 × 10%174.960
01.06.2019Less Deprn (Apr–Jun, 2m): 174.96 × 10% × 2/12 = 2.916172.044
01.06.2019Add: Refund of grant60.000 → CA = 232.044
31.03.2020Less Deprn (Jun–Mar, 10m): 232.044 × 10% × 10/12 = 19.337212.707

### Example 4

Exam question — method vs depreciation amount: Cost ₹60L, Salvage ₹10L, Life 10 years. Grant ₹20L received on 1st April 2021. Find depreciation for Year 2 (2022-23).

Case i — Method 1 (reduce from cost): Net cost = 40L. Deprn = (40−10)/10 = ₹3L each year.

Case ii — Method 2 (DGG): Full cost = 60L. Deprn = (60−10)/10 = ₹5L each year. (DGG releases ₹2L to Other Income each year.)

Note: The reported depreciation line item differs (₹3L vs ₹5L), but net P&L impact is identical.

⚠️ Common exam mistakes

  • In Method 2 (DGG), charging depreciation on net cost instead of gross cost — depreciation is always on full gross cost under Method 2
  • Forgetting to transfer DGG to P&L each year — DGG must be released proportionately every period, not held until grant conditions expire
  • Thinking Method 1 and Method 2 produce different P&L results — they give identical net P&L impact, only presentation (line items) differs
  • Under WDV, computing DGG release as a fixed equal annual installment (Grant/Life) — for WDV the release should be proportionate to actual depreciation charged each year
  • In Method 1, not reducing the grant from the asset before computing depreciation — the depreciation base is net cost, not gross cost
Reference: Paragraphs 13–17 (Grants Related to Specific Fixed Assets) — AS 12 — Accounting for Government Grants, ICAI
Now that you've read this — what's next?
Move from understanding → mastery in 3 clicks. Each option below picks up from this lesson's topic.
Start 15-min diagnostic